Unionville Post Unionville Post
Person with "I Voted" button.

U.S. Court Rules on the Voting Rights Act of 1965

By Opinions Editors

On April 29, 2026, The Supreme Court ruled to weaken The Voting Rights Act of 1965 in the case Louisiana v. Callais. This decision limits Section two of The Voting Rights Act, which forbids the practices that discriminate on the basis of race, color, or membership in a minority group. Ultimately, this decision threatens minority voting power, which could transform American democracy by giving states more freedom to draw election lines.

Initially, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was implemented to combat racial discrimination. This legislation emerged from the violence that ensued during the Civil Rights movement. Bloody Sunday, a pivotal moment in the Civil Rights Movement, occurred on March 7th, 1965, when 600 civil rights marchers were brutally attacked by State troopers, while they protested to outlaw discriminatory voting practices. Directly after, President Lyndon B. Johnson executed The Voting Rights Act of 1965, outlawing literacy tests, establishing federal oversight of elections, and protecting language minorities by promoting inclusivity initiatives.

Section two fights against the gerrymandered maps that inhibit the voices of minority voters. For 61 years, this has empowered courts to strike down maps that weaken Black or Latino influence, consequently promoting diversity in the legislatures. Furthermore, this increased the voting population in these minority groups which boost diversity throughout the nation.

Recently, a Supreme Court ruling altered how Section two would take effect. The majority, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, believed that courts should reject maps that focus on race as the main factor. In response, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson used the phrase “death knell” to describe the adverse effects this could have on minority groups. She argued that this ruling creates a trap, as race-aware maps are needed to combat discrimination. However, such maps are now getting labeled as “unconstitutional.” This decision's effects will be exhibited in future elections. In states like Louisiana, Alabama, and Georgia, where Black voters make up 25-30 percent of the population, maps can easily avoid creating majority minority districts. Moreover, this change could decrease Democrat seats in the House, which skews power towards the Republican party, posing as an advantage for the Republican party in the upcoming midterm elections.

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 should stand as a reminder of the struggles undergone by people of color during the Civil Rights era. Furthermore, by hindering Section two of the act, race-conscious remedies will no longer be used to fix discriminatory maps. Ultimately, this will decrease diversity in the legislature and prove detrimental to future generations.